Pitfalls in differential diagnosis of breast carcinoma
Nakopoulou L., Paizi-Biza P.
Department of Pathology, University of Athens
Pitfalls in breast cancer diagnosis concern interpretation of
frozen section as well as gross and histological examination.
Problems in frozen section diagnosis may be created either by
overdiagnosis which is the commonest, or by under-diagnosis. Benign
lesions overdiagnosed as carcinoma are florid epithelial hyperplasia in a fibroadenoma, especially when a small piece of tissue
is available, a chronic inflammatory mass, a papilloma and sclerosing
adenosis. The latter is the lesion most commonly overdiagnosed
in frozen section. Underdiagnosis of malignant lesions includes
in situ carcinoma most commonly the LCIS, infiltrating lobular
carcinoma and tubular carcinoma. In gross and conventional histologic
examination, a variety of benign lesions can mimic invasive breast
cancer. Some benign lesions possess imaging and/or gross features
suggestive of malignancy but usually do not present diagnostic
difficulties after microscopic examination such as surgical scars,
fat necrosis, granular cell tumors. Other benign breast lesions
have a suspicious radiographic and/or macroscopic appearance and
also have microscopic features confused with those of invasive
carcinoma e.g. radial scars, complex sclerosing lesions, mucocele-like
lesions. Finally, benign lesions not associated with radiographic
or macroscopic changes suggesting malignancy, possess worrisome
microscopic features (e.g. microglandular adenosis). On the other
hand, some examples of in situ breast carcinoma may have microscopic
patterns simulating invasive carcinoma, for instance LCIS involving
areas of sclerosing adenosis. It is also important to consider
the possibility of eronneous diagnosis after needling procedures
which can induce a number of artefacts in subsequent breast excision
specimens. These include displacement of benign ductal epithelium
or DCIS cells into the stroma or into vascular spaces. For minimizing
pitfalls in breast cancer diagnosis it is of paramount importance
for the pathologist to be provided by clinical data. Moreover
the same pathologist should perform the naked-eye pathology
and microscopic examination.
 |
|
|
|